Autor: Efrain Mendez Morales

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25058/1794600X.1039

The present written deals with the concept of liability, this is a legal term that is defined as the quality of a person to comprehend the consequences that will bring the voluntary performance of an unlawful act, and as such should be responsible, legally processed and liable for the act committed.

The medical expert witness in this type of case plays a vital role in the final decision that may carry the trial at the time of the verdict.

El presente documento trata sobre el concepto de responsabilidad, término legal que se define como la calidad de una persona para comprender las consecuencias que traerá el desempeño voluntario de un acto ilegal, y como tal debe ser responsable, procesado legalmente y hallado legalmente responsable por el acto cometido.

El testigo médico experto en este tipo de casos juega un papel vital en la decisión final que puede llevar el juicio en el momento del veredicto.

O presente documento trata do conceito de responsabilidade, este é um termo legal que é definido como a qualidade de uma pessoa para compreender as conseqüências que trarão a execução voluntária de um ato ilegal e, como tal, deve ser responsável, processado e responsabilizado legalmente. pelo ato cometido.

A testemunha médica especialista nesse tipo de caso desempenha um papel vital na decisão final que pode levar o julgamento no momento do veredicto.

Keywords:Liability, insanity, crime,responsibility, guilt, mentally disease, law, Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI).

Palabras claves: Responsabilidad, demencia, crimen, culpa, enfermedad mental, ley, No culpable por razón de demencia (NGRI).

Palavras-chave: Responsabilidade, insanidade, crime, responsabilidade, culpa, doença mental, lei, Não é culpado por razão de insanidade (NGRI).

Para citar este artículo:

Mendez, E. (2019). Insanity Defense in Criminal Offenses Charges. Revista Misión Jurídica, 12, (17), 29-37.


Referencias

American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., Text Revision). Washington, DC.

Andersen v. United States, 237 F. 2d 118, (1956).

Borum, R. and Fulero, S. (1999). Empirical Research on the Insanity Defense and attempted reforms. Evidence toward Informed Policy. Law and Human Behavior, 23(3), pp. 375-394.

Callahan, L.; McGreevey, M.;Morrissey, J; and Steadman, H.(1993). Before and After Hinckley:Evaluating Insanity Defense Reform. The Guilford Press. pp. 15-112.

Campos Rodríguez v. Pueblo de Puerto Rico, Tribunal de Apelaciones. Caso Número: KLAN2011-0769 (2012). [Translation by the author: Campos Rodriguez v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Court of Appeals. Case Number: KLAN2011-0769. (2012)].

Caplan, L., The Insanity Defense and the Trial of John W. Hinckley, Jr. (1984). pp.10-125. Olympic Marketing Corp.

Clark, R. (1995). Insanity and the Death Penalty. Capital Punishment UK. Retrieved from: http://www.capitalpunishmentuk.org/biblio.html

Clark v. Arizona, 548 U.S. 735, 126 S. Ct. 2709 (2006).

Comprehensive Crime Control Act, Public Law 98-473-October 12, 1984, 98 STAT. 1837.

Congress wraps up a crime package. (1984). ABA Journal, 70(12), 44-46.

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993).

Delusion: a false belief that persists despite the facts and is common in some psychotic states. Webster’s Intermediate Dictionary. G.& C. Merriam Company, Publishers. Springfield, Massachusetts, U.S.A. 1977. Pp. 195.

Durham v. U.S., 94 U.S. App. D.C. 228, 214 F. 2d 862 (1954).

Hays, J. (2002). State of Texas v. Andrea Yates. Retrieved from The National Psychologist at: http://nationalpsychologist.com/2002/05/state-of-texas-v-andrea-yates/10608.html

Inderbitzin, R. (1969). Criminal Law-The ALI Model Penal Code Test. Lexis Nexis. Retrieved from: https://litigationewssencialts.lexisnexis.com/webcd/app?action=DocumentDisplay&cra

Jones v. U.S., 463 U.S. 354, 103 S. Ct. 3043 (1983).

Fifth Amendment: “No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law..” [U.S. Const. Amend. V].

Fingarette, H. and Fingarette A. (1979). Mental Disabilities and Criminal Responsibility. pp.148-153.

Foucha v. Louisiana, 112 S. Ct. 1780 (1992).

Frederick, R.I. (2012). Insanity defense, diminished capacity mitigation. In D. Faust (Ed). Coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony: Based on the original work by Jay Ziskin (6th ed.)pp. 535-541. New York, NY, US. Oxford University Press.

Freeman, 4 Denio 8 [sic] (1847). First use of the insanity defense in the United States. Available at: http://www.nycounts.gov/history-new-york/legal-history-eras-02/history-new-york-legal-eras-people-freeman.html.

Frendak v. U.S., 408 A. 2d 364 (1979).

Garner, Bryan A; McDanel, Becky R; Schultz, David W. Black Law Dictionary. St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. Page 376. (5th ed. 1996).

Goldstein, Abraham S., The Insanity Defense, (1967). pp. 100-179. Yale University Press.

Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984, Pub. Law No. 98-473, 98 Stat. 2057 (codified as amended at 18 U.S.C §4.01 (1) (1962).

Mathews, S and Kennet, J, (eds), (2004), Special Issue on “Responsibility and Mental Impairment.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27:pp. 395-503.

Melamed, Yuval, Mentally Ill Who Commit Crimes: Punishment or Treatment?, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, March 2010, 38 (1), 100-103.

Melville JD, Naimark D: Punishing the insane: the verdict of guilty but mentally ill. Journal of American Academy of Psychiatry Law 30: 553-5, 2002.

Moran, R. (1985). The Origen of as a Special Verdict: The Trial for Treason of James Hadfield. Law and Society Review. pp. 19, 487-519.

M’Naghten’s case, 8 Eng. Rep. 718, SEng. Rep. 722 (1843).

Necrophilia, also known as necrophilism is a sexual attraction or sexual act involving corpses. Webster’s Intermediate Dictionary. G.& C. Merriam Company, Publishers Springfield, Massachusetts, U.S.A. 1977. It is classified as a paraphilia by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) of the American Psychiatric Association.

Packer, I.K. (2015). Legal insanity and mens rea defenses. In B.L. Cutler and P.A. Zapf (Eds.) APA handbook of forensic psychology, Vol. 1: Individual and situational influences influences in criminal and civil context. Pp 87-114. Washington, D.C. US: American Psychological Association.

Pub. L. 93–595, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1926, enacted the Federal Rules of Evidence proposed by the Supreme Court, with amendments made by Congress, to take effect on July 1, 1975.

Rogers, Jeffrey L., et al, Insanity Defenses: contested or conceded?, 141 Am. J. Psychiatry 885,886 (1984).

Rogers, R. and Shuman, D.W. (2000). Conducting Insanity Evaluations. (2nd ed.). pp.5-78. Guilford Press.

Salize HJ; Dreissing H: Placement and treatment of mentally ill offenders: legislation and practice in EU member states. Final report, February 15, 2005. Available at: http://ec.europe.eu/health/ph_information/implement/wp/mental/docs/ev_20050530_co04_en.pdf.

Sauer v. United States, 241 F. 2d 640(9th Cir. 1957).

Silva, J.; Ferrari, M. and Leong, G. (2002). The Case of Jeffrey Dahmer:Sexual Serial. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 47 (6).

Steele, Scott (May 20, 1996), “Abbotsford Killer Arrested”, Macleans. The Canadian Encyclopedia.

Stanley Semrau, M.D. and Gale Judy, Murderous Minds on Trial (2001).Toronto. pp 24-66. The Dundurn Group.

Terry, Zachary D; Billik Stephen B; Overlapping Universe: Understanding Legal Insanity and Psychosis (2010). Psychiatry Quarterly. DOI: 10.1007/s11126-010-9134-2.

The Andrea Yates case: Insanity Trial, Phillip J. Resnick. Western Reserve University, School of Medicine (2007).

The Model Penal Code (MPC) is not law in any jurisdiction of the United States; however, it served and continues to serve as a basis for the replacement of existing criminal codes in over two-thirds of the states. Many states adopted portions of the MPC, but only states such as New Jersey, New York, and Oregon have enacted almost all of the provisions of it.

The People of the State of Colorado v. James Holmes, 12CR1522.

Turkewitz, J. (2015, July 9). Aurora Gunman Legally Insane, Psychiatrist Says. The New York Times. pp. A19.

Turkewitz, J. (2015, July 9). Aurora Gunman Legally Insane, Psychiatrist Says. The New York Times. pp. A19.

United States v. Hinckley, 672 F.2d 115(D.C. Cir. 1982).

Waelder, R. (1952) Psychiatry and the Problem of Criminal Responsibility. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 101 (3), pp. 378-390.

Waldman A: (199, January 4).Woman killed in a subway station attack. The New York Times.

Washington v. U.S., 129 U.S. App. D.C. 29, 390 F. 2d 444 (1967).

Weiss, Kenneth J. and Gupta, Naha, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. December 2018, 46 (4) 503-512; DOI: http:// doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.003795-18.

Yates v. Texas, 171 SW. 3 d 215, 222 (Tex. App. 2005).